Interactive tool
Claims Cost Comparison
Model what a covered repair or loss would cost out of pocket versus with a product in place.
The repair
The contract
Per visit charges the deductible once no matter how many covered repairs are done that day. Per repair charges it for each one. Two contracts quoting the same amount can bill very differently on a multi-repair visit, which is what the toggle is here to show.
Estimated out of pocket
Without a contract
$1,600
1 repair at $1,600
With a contract
$100
deductible once
| Covered by the contract on this visit | $1,500 |
| Less what the contract cost | -$1,800 |
| Net position after this visit | -$300 |
This one repair does not on its own recover the contract price. That is normal and is not by itself an argument either way: the contract runs for a term, and the honest question is whether a repair of this size is likely during it.
Estimated from the figures entered, and assumes the repair is covered. Whether any specific failure is covered is decided by the contract at adjudication. Educational only, not a quote and not advice.
Who it’s for
Buyers weighing value and finance managers illustrating it honestly.
What it does
Model what a covered repair or loss would cost out of pocket versus with a product in place.
What you’ll get
A side-by-side estimate of out-of-pocket exposure with and without the product.
The deductible structure is the point
Two contracts advertising the same deductible can bill very differently. Per visit charges once however many covered repairs happen that day; per repair charges for each one. On a visit that finds three unrelated failures, that is the difference between one deductible and three.
It is one of the least visible and most consequential differences between contracts, which is why the toggle is here rather than in a footnote.
One repair is not the whole argument
A single repair frequently does not recover the contract price, and that on its own settles nothing. A contract runs for a term, and the real question is what is likely to happen across it.
The honest framing is that the contract converts an unpredictable cost into a known one. Whether that trade is worth its price depends on the vehicle, the term, and how comfortably the customer could absorb a large repair unexpectedly.
This assumes the repair is covered
That assumption is doing a lot of work. Whether a specific failure is covered depends on the component list, the cause of failure, maintenance documentation, and authorization before work began. A repair that seems obviously covered can fail on any of those.
Learn the topic behind this tool
Want this run on your store?
Elite FI Partners can apply this analysis to your actual finance office once you’ve seen how it works.
Ask about a review